Land Registry staff unsettled by latest announcement

It’s nearly three months since the Land Registry proposals were announced, and I’ve not said a lot about them since. There’s not been that much to say, as those of us in the offices marked for closure can really only sit and wait: the formal consultation period ends on January 31st, and there’s then a “period of reflection” before the final decision is revealed – probably sometime in March. So things had settled down somewhat and people had generally just been getting on with their work until we know exactly what’s happening.

But on Monday we were all unsettled again. An email to all staff from the Chief Executive, Peter Collis. Announcing that he’s leaving. On January 31st.

This from the official press release:

“It has been an enormous privilege to lead Land Registry for the last 10 years and I am immensely proud of all that has been achieved during that time. But, looking ahead, it is clear that, just as Land Registry is changing, so the role of Chief Executive will change. In my view, now is the time to make way for someone with different skills and experience to take Land Registry forward.”

What, only a couple of weeks’ notice? Hmm. Seems odd. Lots of rumour and speculation going round as to why he’s going so suddenly, and whether he’s been – ahem – “asked” to leave, and if so by whom, but of course that’s all it is: rumour and speculation. And a little hearsay thrown in for good measure, but as a magistrate I know how careful you have to be with hearsay as a reliable source of information so I’ll not repeat any of that on here. Oh, and for good measure the deputy Chief Executive has also announce his departure on the same date. He was due for retirement after 43 years with Land Registry anyway, but again a very sudden announcement and short notice period. Curious.

The timing is very significant: they’ll not be overseeing the “period of reflection”, and won’t  be around to deal with the repercussions once the final decision is announced.

So who is going to be in charge? Let’s look at that press release again:

Marco Pierleoni, currently Director-General, Finance and Commercial at the Ministry of Justice, will be succeeding Peter until the role of Chief Executive is advertised and filled.

Marco said:

“I am pleased to be joining Land Registry at this exciting time, and to be taking forward the proposals set out in the accelerated transformation programme to enable Land Registry to become the lean, flexible and even more customer-focussed organisation that we all want it to be.”

Ah, I see. They’ve not yet advertised and recruited a replacement, so we’re going to be run by someone from the Ministry of Justice. Someone who sees this as an exciting time, and who is pleased to be “taking forward the proposals set out in the accelerated transformation programme”.

Yeah, he’s got the mood of the offices just right – we’re all really excited, too.

(Here’s a link to the press release, if you’re interested.)

UPDATE: March 2011, Marco Pierleoni has now resigned. See here for details.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Land Registry staff unsettled by latest announcement

  1. Paul Prowse

    Imminent re-structural change I’m guessing – perhaps once the closures have gone through the remaining offices might fall under a different gov. department, and as these 2 will play no part in the new structure makes sense to pay them off and keep them quiet, though I doubt the unions will see it that way.

    It’s only a guess mind.

    Paul.

    Reply
  2. Trevor Post author

    As I moaned about Marco Pierlioni’s comments in his opening email, I guessout of fairnes I should also mention that he has since quite publically apologised for them. It seems I was far from the only one to complain, and he replied as follows:

    “I have received a large number of emails from staff on the reference to ‘exciting’ in my opening email message on joining the Land Registry.

    A number of staff have said they found my use of this term as offensive and inappropriate in light of the proposed ATP office closures. I would like to express my regret and apologise for causing offence and agree that my choice of words was inappropriate.

    My choice of words was only intended to portray my excitement in joining an important and historical organisation such as the Land Registry.”

    Reply

What do *you* think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s